A phase 1b clinical trial evaluating sifalimumab, an anti-IFN-α monoclonal antibody, shows target neutralisation of a type I IFN signature in blood of dermatomyositis …

BW Higgs, W Zhu, C Morehouse, WI White… - Annals of the …, 2014 - ard.bmj.com
BW Higgs, W Zhu, C Morehouse, WI White, P Brohawn, X Guo, M Rebelatto, C Le, A Amato
Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014ard.bmj.com
Objective To assess the pharmacodynamic effects of sifalimumab, an investigational anti-
IFN-α monoclonal antibody, in the blood and muscle of adult dermatomyositis and
polymyositis patients by measuring neutralisation of a type I IFN gene signature (IFNGS)
following drug exposure. Methods A phase 1b randomised, double-blinded, placebo
controlled, dose-escalation, multicentre clinical trial was conducted to evaluate sifalimumab
in dermatomyositis or polymyositis patients. Blood and muscle biopsies were procured …
Objective
To assess the pharmacodynamic effects of sifalimumab, an investigational anti-IFN-α monoclonal antibody, in the blood and muscle of adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis patients by measuring neutralisation of a type I IFN gene signature (IFNGS) following drug exposure.
Methods
A phase 1b randomised, double-blinded, placebo controlled, dose-escalation, multicentre clinical trial was conducted to evaluate sifalimumab in dermatomyositis or polymyositis patients. Blood and muscle biopsies were procured before and after sifalimumab administration. Selected proteins were measured in patient serum with a multiplex assay, in the muscle using immunohistochemistry, and transcripts were profiled with microarray and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assays. A 13-gene IFNGS was used to measure the pharmacological effect of sifalimumab.
Results
The IFNGS was suppressed by a median of 53–66% across three time points (days 28, 56 and 98) in blood (p=0.019) and 47% at day 98 in muscle specimens post-sifalimumab administration. Both IFN-inducible transcripts and proteins were prevalently suppressed following sifalimumab administration. Patients with 15% or greater improvement from baseline manual muscle testing scores showed greater neutralisation of the IFNGS than patients with less than 15% improvement in both blood and muscle. Pathway/functional analysis of transcripts suppressed by sifalimumab showed that leucocyte infiltration, antigen presentation and immunoglobulin categories were most suppressed by sifalimumab and highly correlated with IFNGS neutralisation in muscle.
Conclusions
Sifalimumab suppressed the IFNGS in blood and muscle tissue in myositis patients, consistent with this molecule's mechanism of action with a positive correlative trend between target neutralisation and clinical improvement. These observations will require confirmation in a larger trial powered to evaluate efficacy.
ard.bmj.com